Ron Paul 9-10-08 Press Conference
September 6, 2009 - 1:13 am
Ron Paul held a press conference urging voters to select a third-party presidential candidate instead of Barack Obama or John McCain. CNN Video
See the entire conference at: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5899338291241389730&hl=en
Duration : 0:10:21
[youtube c1LMoWqXrE4]
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Respect!
Respect!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
imo.This man was …
imo.This man was our one and only hope. After Obama finishes up what Daddy Bush,Clinton and Junior Bush had planned for this country,we are doomed. Get ready,it’s right around the corner!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Long live Ron Paul! …
Long live Ron Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Hell yeah, Ron Paul …
yeah, Ron Paul. I voted for a third party candidate: Bob Barr. I wish that more people would vote for who they really believe in and forget the two-party system. My favorite from the start was Ron Paul, but he dropped out. He needs to run as a Libertarian in the next election. Vote for third party.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
The way Ron Paul …
The way Ron Paul was treated and censored just shows what the government is capable of and we can NOT let them do this to people. 1st Amendment can not be taken away from us.
Dr. Ron Paul Rocks!!!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
IMPORTANT
The TIME …
IMPORTANT
The TIME magazine lets the YT-users vote
for the person of the year!!
/watch?v=Bm94D1TqYwQ
It would be awesome if you would leave a comment for RON PAUL and write why you nominate him for the person of the year.
The win of this voting would give him a big push. Many more people would get to know him.
AND 3 out of 4 (round about) have already voted for him.
So if some you you guys would go to this video and vote for him we can make a difference in the next election race!!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
I pledge Ignorance. …
I pledge Ignorance. Little did I know that he’s dropped out as a candidate. As a 14year old boy I shall strive to keep up with the times. whoops!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
I rather Obama than …
I rather Obama than you. You steal votes from the liberals, why should we vote for you when there’s no way you can possibly get in? Don’t throw away your vote!Vote Obama!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
ron, please be our …
ron, please be our president!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
This is a step in …
This is a step in the right direction. Look at what happened to the Federalist part, the Whig party etc. I’m sick of the republi-crats and the dem-icans! It’s time for real change back to the constitution and what our founders and people have DIED for. This is our United States!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
The republican and …
The republican and Democratic parties are the ones that organize the debates. The questions are all fluff and pointless. They don’t want to let people with actual ideology to win, the just want to keep things the same.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Well, if you …
Well, if you watched what Ron Paul said. (Which was far from being out of line) The constitution would decide who could theoretically win. (Like it is supposed to be) And WE THE PEOPLE would get to hear ALL of the candidates who could potentially win. So that WE THE PEOPLE could make a FAIR, FULLY INFORMED DECISION about who will make the decisions for OUR country. Instead of being deceived by the media. And stuck with people who aren’t worthy of the people’s trust.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Kid - “theoretical” …
Kid - “theoretical” doesn’t mean “abstract.” It means “possible.” In this case, if a candidate (like the Libertarian or Green candidate) is on enough ballots to win the majority of electoral votes, then he or she should be included in any publicly-funded debates. This would exclude candidates that were on only one or two or twenty states’ ballots. But it WOULD include candidates who are on 47 or 48 or 49 or 50 ballots.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
who gets to decide …
who gets to decide what qualifies as a “theoretical win?” Who gets to decide whether the candidates would get there es handed to them. Your still using the same logic that the Democrats and Republicans would say there using.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
WHAT MARKED …
WHAT MARKED THIS AS SPAM!!!!! Thanks for the link
Chuck Baldwin for president BALDWIN08 COM
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Maybe they didn’t …
Maybe they didn’t show up. Or maybe they don’t aren’t on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win. The reason they won’t let them debate is because they would get their es handed to them. If they aren’t afraid of that, why would they exclude someone who could win?
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
he’s proposing …
he’s proposing something that would be the next step into those particular candidates.. u gotta start somewhere
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Some day, …
Some day, eventually, the truth will be revealed fully. The elite who are interested in hiding or obscuring the truth will make a mistake, and people will see our government and our country for what it is….and what it could be.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
yes Ron Paul, you …
yes Ron Paul, you are so on it, thank you! this is it, americans; let’s get together on this forget sending more troops like both obama and mccain wants to do, and have some real change here… Save this country now.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
I am voting for …
I am voting for Chuck Baldwin. We need to stop throwing our votes away on our one-party system, the Democrat/Republicans. We need to return to Constitutional government, not government of, for and by the special interests.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
The two parties are …
The two parties are the same, hummm thats what Im thanking
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
this is such …
this is such hypocracy! Where is the prohibition party canidate?…where is the Communist party canidate? Where’s the Boston Tea Party canidate? Where’s the reform party? The Socialist workers party? These people are using the same (reasonable) logic to exclude the aforemention canidates that the GOP and the Democrats are using to exclude THEM!
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
what site did u get …
what site did u get this from
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
I love Ron Paul so …
I love Ron Paul so much.
September 6th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Green Change has …
Green Change has the email addresses for Commission on Presidential Debates board members, who are disregarding the popular will by refusing to open the debates to ballot-qualified candidates like Baldwin, Barr, McKinney, and Nader. Go to GreenChangeDotOrg and tell the CPD that you want open, democratic debates now.