Ron Paul Opening Statement Fed Hearing 07/21/2009

July 27, 2009 - 2:24 am

http://campaignforliberty.com/
http://libertymaven.com/

Duration : 0:3:8


[youtube pSRvnXtrmtE]

25 Responses to “Ron Paul Opening Statement Fed Hearing 07/21/2009”

  1. stealthswimmer Says:

    Sure but that isn’t …
    Sure but that isn’t enough to cause a huge boom. More money in the system is usually the cause of that. Indeed, money supply DID grow in the 90s which caused a boom and eventually ended in a bust. Shortly thereafter, the housing boom (also caused by excess money creation) took place.
    Not to mention that a lot of taxes are not indexed for inflation, so you end up having less purchasing power and a higher tax rate.

  2. DangerMouse232 Says:

    hahahahahaha NO Homo
    hahahahahaha NO Homo

  3. DangerMouse232 Says:

    he’s Not tryna Do …
    he’s Not tryna Do Anarchy though…

  4. DangerMouse232 Says:

    you can tell He …
    you can tell He Coudlnt take it…When Ben has to Answer Ron Paul Questions..he’s All tensioned Up And At the End Of the Question You know Ben Is” Like Im glad Ron Paul is Done talking

  5. DangerMouse232 Says:

    Ron Paul Whispered …
    Ron Paul Whispered aww please Because He only got 2 minutes to Do his Opening Hearing LOL

    He probably wanted More than That To Rip Ben Up

  6. kokobaboko Says:

    You are the …
    You are the misguided one. Just because the country has been hijacked doesn’t mean that’s how it is. Without the people’s capitulation to the bankers, they have no power. They are outnumbered hundreds of millions to one. Keep your defeatist ideals to yourself and don’t walk in my mind with your dirty feet.

  7. dstauby Says:

    Do you know …
    Do you know anything about Robert Reich and what he says about deficits?

    Deficits don’t change the value of the dollar? High deficits don’t change tax rates?

    Go back to the drawing board.

  8. dstauby Says:

    we’re 30 trillion …
    we’re 30 trillion in debt? Only RonPaulBots would believe your baseless claims.

  9. dstauby Says:

    Like I said, ” …
    Like I said, “OOOOOOOKKKKKKKKK”. You continue on your your fantasy world.

  10. lookingforthemeaning Says:

    TEA TIME :-)
    TEA TIME :-)

  11. lookingforthemeaning Says:

    obama knows what he …
    obama knows what he is doing, because it is what he is being told to do by the bankers he has placed in all critical parts of government. big thank you to trilateral and especialy CFR.

  12. lookingforthemeaning Says:

    faschist capitalist …
    faschist capitalist despotits. is a bit exacter :-)

  13. bobysoad666 Says:

    i’m a guy but i …
    i’m a guy but i would love to suck jeff hardy’s dick

  14. quattrorings Says:

    LOL!!!! When it …
    LOL!!!! When it comes to politics, “That RACE train is always on time”! Looks like both sides are whippin out their race cards today!! Oh, yeah BOTH whites & blacks have their own race cards, the only difference is (in the construct of the US timeline) one just started to use it & one has had it for hundreds of years! Racists of all types whether they hide behind excuses made by “the man” or hide behind this new hyper (kill’em all let god sort’em out) patriotism are COMICAL!!

  15. dwcai81 Says:

    Ron Paul just owned …
    Ron Paul just owned all conservatives and liberals.

  16. dwcai81 Says:

    No, they are not. …
    No, they are not. They are very much Communist. Free enterprise does not exist in China.

  17. stealthswimmer Says:

    No, actually he …
    No, actually he couldn’t do that. Too many people think he’s crazy. I supported him, but let’s be realistic….a lot of people didn’t like his ideas. Or they agree with a lot but VEHEMENTLY disagree with him on one or two things and therefore throw their support behind who they’re comfortable with (who they usually, ironically, also vehemently disagree on or two things…or sometime disagree on multiple things with but really like on particular things)

  18. stealthswimmer Says:

    history changer in …
    history changer in the sense that they actually know economics whereas “historians” simply ert that it MUST have been a contraction since there were falling prices. National employment statistics weren’t kept at the time so various sectors had to be looked at individually. Furthermore, there was no monetary contraction, as money supply was growing about 2.4% a year if i remember correctly. Plus, expanding per capita output.

  19. stealthswimmer Says:

    I guess the dot-com …
    I guess the dot-com boom doesn’t count for anything, huh? Booms always result in more jobs, and the boom was not the result of fiscal policy.

  20. stealthswimmer Says:

    No, actually it’s …
    No, actually it’s not. They’re not a free market, but they’re not socialist. They’re a mixed economy like most other countries. The trend they’ve been going on has been going further towards a market-oriented society in order to let their economy grow.

  21. SaginawGS Says:

    Obama HAS tripled …
    Obama HAS tripled our debt, pay attention!

  22. kkklownknight6699 Says:

    The Chinese economy …
    The Chinese economy is run in the manner of the same principles of anywhere else in this world which is sell products for profit.

    They don’t even have a welfare system.

    In other words China is run like Europe and America in the 1800’s.

    But I don’t see what this has to do with Marxism.

  23. Oceanno69 Says:

    Monetary system is …
    Monetary system is TOOO HARD for the SHEEP to Understand! The More money you Print the LESS it is WORTH!
    Like I said it’s TOOOOO HARD!

  24. dstauby Says:


    OOOOOOOOOkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

    It’s always funny how the nut jobs don’t backup the claim.

  25. Ridgid Says:

    Lets start the …
    Lets start the economic recovery by getting rid of BARNEY FRANK..!!!!

Leave a Reply